Criteria employed are often subjective, have little rational basis and differ wildly between insurers. The result is:
Customers receive an inconsistent service that depends upon the identity of their insurer, and many claims are paid where windstorm is unlikely to have been the cause.
Insurers rightly need to treat their customers fairly, but can still dramatically reduce their exposure to storm, contain losses and act more decisively by tightening peril definitions and employing more rigorous process.
Our survey revealed that some insurers deemed gusts of 38mph as sufficient to evidence windstorm, whilst others required gusts of at least 55mph. There was a similar lack of consensus in the latitude granted for customers to frame the loss date, and their attitude towards late notifications.
Our work culminated in a set of tables that enable insurers to benchmark the standards they employ against their peers and competitors and also to quantify the effect of adopting new rules on their annual storm claim exposure and spend.
Key benefits
Key features
For further information about our service, please contact Steve Roberts on
+44 1202 296396 or email steve@weathernet.co.uk or visit our website at weathernet.co.uk